Exploring the application of social media in food waste campaigns and interventions: A systematic scoping review of the academic and grey literature
Journal of Cleaner Production, ISSN: 0959-6526, Vol: 360, Page: 132068
2022
- 37Citations
- 162Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Review Description
Consumer food waste is a growing issue that has a severe impact on the economy and the environment. Social media is an online communication tool that has the potential to reach a large proportion of the population with relative ease. However, it is unclear whether social media can be used to encourage consumers to reduce their food waste. To determine how social media is currently being used in food waste reduction campaigns and interventions and whether it could be an effective communication tool to discourage consumer food waste. Eight academic databases from multiple disciplines were searched in combination with grey literature. Inclusion criteria were consumer-focused food waste interventions or campaigns that used social media as part of their strategy and had food waste reduction as a main outcome. Exclusion criteria included the use of websites or mobile applications rather than social media, non-English papers, and review papers. Seventeen studies were included. Social media was found to have a positive impact in eleven studies e.g. raising awareness or contributing to consumer food waste reduction. Multifaceted interventions or campaigns (rather than those that used social media alone) were found to be more effective at increasing consumer understanding of food waste and/or producing initial behaviour changes such as taking leftovers for lunch, for example. Most of the included interventions or campaigns did not report a social media strategy or self-defined targets to achieve prior to beginning the campaign. Social media data included in the papers focused mainly on social media metrics (e.g. reach of the posts) rather than tangible outcomes from consumers who saw the posts. Multifaceted approaches that combine social media with other behaviour change strategies are recommended to encourage consumer behaviour change in relation to food waste reduction. Social media needs to be further explored for consumer food waste reduction, with a focus on the importance of comprehensive plans and strategies prior to beginning the campaign or intervention.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652622016754; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132068; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85131262357&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0959652622016754; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132068
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know