Smart-Plant Decision Support System (SP-DSS): Defining a multi-criteria decision-making framework for the selection of WWTP configurations with resource recovery
Journal of Cleaner Production, ISSN: 0959-6526, Vol: 367, Page: 132873
2022
- 12Citations
- 72Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The development of the Smart-Plant Decision Support System (SP-DSS) is presented, which helps to find the optimal water resource recovery facility (WRRF) configuration for a specific case. A general plant superstructure is defined to allow the evaluation of different combinations among the available process unit options, considering technical, economic, and environmental impact criteria. The complete evaluation is based on a five-step framework: (i) design problem set-up, (ii) wastewater inflow generation, (iii) superstructure generation and plant-wide model simulation under dynamic conditions, (iv) estimation of multi-criteria objective values (greenhouse gas emissions, accumulation of effluent violations, effluent quality index, net present value, system readiness level and plant land area), and (v) design configuration multi-criteria sorting with the technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS). SP-DSS application is shown comparing the mainstream shortcut enhanced phosphorus and polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) recovery (SCEPPHAR) technology with a conventional anaerobic/anoxic/aerobic (A2O) configuration for a medium size WWTP (Manresa, Spain). The comparison shows both configurations allow meeting discharge limits, and among other criteria, the SCEPPHAR novel configuration, with respect to A2O, shows higher pollutant contents in the effluent (3.30 vs 2.34 gPoll/m 3 ), higher capital expenditures (CAPEX 0.191 vs 0.130 €/m 3 ), lower operational expenditures (OPEX 0.397 vs 0.515 €/m 3 ), lower required tariff (0.654 vs 0.674 €/m 3 ) and higher greenhouse gas emissions (GHG 0.19 vs 0.14 kgCO 2 /m 3 ). Overall, TOPSIS sorting indicates A2O is still the best configuration for this specific case.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652622024660; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132873; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85133811521&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0959652622024660; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132873
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know