A multi-objective planning method for multi-energy complementary distributed energy system: Tackling thermal integration and process synergy
Journal of Cleaner Production, ISSN: 0959-6526, Vol: 390, Page: 135905
2023
- 23Citations
- 31Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Most Recent News
Recent Studies from North China Electric Power University Add New Data to Environment and Sustainability Research (A Multi-objective Planning Method for Multi-energy Complementary Distributed Energy System: Tackling Thermal Integration and ...)
2023 MAR 27 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Climate Change Daily News -- Data detailed on Environment - Environment and Sustainability
Article Description
This study proposes a multi-objective optimization methodology for planning multi-energy complementary distributed energy systems considering process synergy and thermal integration. The process integration technique is integrated into the Energy Hub model to deal with the multi-process synergy and temporal source-load matching. The system design and dispatch strategy are optimized by an augmented ε-constraint method with three objectives (economics, carbon emission, and fossil fuel consumption), and then the optimal tradeoff solution is identified by the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution. Moreover, a novel multi-energy complementary distributed energy system is developed, which includes comprehensive utilization of solar energy (photovoltaic, photothermal, and thermochemical) and middle-low temperature heat utilization technologies, as well as hybrid energy storage technologies. Finally, a case study located in Beijing is selected as an illustrated example. The obtained single-objective optimization solutions and Pareto optimal solutions are further analyzed and compared in terms of system configuration, hourly/yearly energy balance, and thermal integration condition. The results show that the multi-energy complementary distributed energy system presents an economic benefit (reducing 25% of the annual total cost) compared to a gas turbine-based integrated energy system. Considering thermal integration contributes to 5.13% of the cost reduction. The configuration of the energy storage devices will reduce 18% energy supply cost, 9% fossil fuel consumption, and 42% carbon emission with the storage devices' boundary increase from 2 MWh to 60 MWh. Moreover, the optimal design of the system provides a reference for decision-making and a basis for flexible operation. The annual total cost, carbon emission, and fossil fuel consumption of the optimal solution in the Pareto frontier are 8.19 million CNY, 2.91 kt CO 2 -eq./year, and 18.4 GWh, respectively.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095965262300063X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.135905; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85146704219&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S095965262300063X; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.135905
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know