Comparative life cycle greenhouse gas emissions assessment of battery energy storage technologies for grid applications
Journal of Cleaner Production, ISSN: 0959-6526, Vol: 392, Page: 136251
2023
- 70Citations
- 90Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Most Recent News
Findings from Xi'an Jiaotong University Provide New Insights into Renewable Energy (Comparative Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessment of Battery Energy Storage Technologies for Grid Applications)
2023 JUN 19 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Climate Change Daily News -- Investigators publish new report on Energy - Renewable
Article Description
With an ever-increasing penetration of renewable energy sources into the power grid, the development and commercialization of large-scale energy storage systems (ESSs) have been enforced. It is imperative to evaluate the environmental sustainability of ESSs in grid applications to achieve sustainable development goals. In the present work, a cradle-to-grave life cycle analysis model, which incorporates the manufacturing, usage, and recycling processes, was developed for prominent electrochemical energy storage technologies, including lithium iron phosphate batteries (LIPBs), nickel cobalt manganese oxide batteries (NCMBs), and vanadium redox flow batteries (VRFBs). A case study was conducted based on per MWh of energy stored. The greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of LIPBs, NCMBs, and VRFBs under the Chinese electrical grid peak-shaving scenario were determined to be 323, 263, and 425 kg CO 2 -eq/MWh, respectively. The key components contributing to the GHG emissions were identified. The GHG emissions of different batteries in renewable energy sources (photovoltaic and wind) were evaluated. Moreover, the GHG emissions under the future electricity mixes were predicted according to the carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goals. The GHG emissions of LIPBs, NCMBs, and VRFBs under the Announced Pledges Scenario could be reduced by approximately 23–27% in 2030 and 66–75% in 2050. Moreover, sensitivity analysis was performed, indicating that the GHG emissions were directly linked with the round-trip efficiency. The results could promote the environment, policy, and business model optimization efforts for large-scale energy storage in low-carbon power systems.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652623004092; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136251; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85147324151&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0959652623004092; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136251
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know