Assessing the resilience of complex ecological spatial networks using a cascading failure model
Journal of Cleaner Production, ISSN: 0959-6526, Vol: 434, Page: 140014
2024
- 9Citations
- 8Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Most Recent News
New Environment and Sustainability Research Study Findings Reported from Chengdu University of Technology (Assessing the Resilience of Complex Ecological Spatial Networks Using a Cascading Failure Model)
2024 JAN 29 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Ecology Daily News -- Current study results on Environment - Environment and Sustainability
Article Description
The resilience of ecological networks is an important guarantee for maintaining regional ecological stability. However, current research on the resilience of ecological networks does not take into account the dynamic processes of the network. This study is based on complex network theory, takes the southern foothills of the Qilian Mountains in China as the research area, and uses the shortest path method to construct an ecological network with 104 nodes and 306 edges. It then uses the cascading failure model to simulate the dynamic response process of the ecological network under different attack strategies, and uses this to evaluate the resilience of the complex ecological space. The research results show that The topological structure of the ecological space network in the southern foothills of the Qilian Mountains has the characteristics of fewer central high-degree nodes and more peripheral low-degree nodes; When the initial load intensity difference of each ecological node in the network is small, the attacked low-degree nodes make the decline in network resilience more obvious. When the initial load intensity difference of each ecological node in the network is large, the attacked high degree nodes make the decline in network resilience more obvious. The study suggests that maintaining the load of high degree nodes and increasing the capacity of low degree nodes are the keys to maintaining network stability. The results provide a new perspective for optimising ecological network configuration and protecting key areas.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652623041720; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140014; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85178659717&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0959652623041720; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140014
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know