Enhancing the efficiency of metals extraction from waste lithium-ion batteries through glycine leaching using response surface methodology for economic feasibility
Journal of Cleaner Production, ISSN: 0959-6526, Vol: 447, Page: 141602
2024
- 9Citations
- 28Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Most Recent News
Report Summarizes Environment and Sustainability Research Study Findings from CSIR - National Environmental Engineering Research Institute (Enhancing the Efficiency of Metals Extraction From Waste Lithium-ion Batteries Through Glycine Leaching ...)
2024 MAY 16 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Ecology Daily News -- Investigators publish new report on Environment - Environment and
Article Description
Recycling of lithium-ion batteries (LiBs) has captured remarkable interest due to its potential to mitigate pollution and conserve natural resources and energy. This study is establishing an environment friendly method for metals leaching from LiBs utilizing glycine (NH 2 CH 2 COOH) as a leaching agent. Li dissolution is being investigated as a function of time, pulp density, glycine concentration, and temperature. The results are evincing the leaching of Li (around 94%) using 2 M glycine at 75 °C temperature, 50 g/L pulp density and 120 min mixing time. Response surface methodology (RSM) techniques are being employed to enhance the standard hydrometallurgical process. The kinetics of Li leaching are well fitted with the “chemical reaction-controlled process” equation of the shrinking core model (1 - (1 - x) 1/3 = kt) and the energy of activation is found to be 23.69 kJ/mol. Moreover, the economic evaluation of the leaching process reveals that at optimum conditions, the average profit response for treated metals is 2394.56 USD per tonne of black powder. Therefore, the use of glycine as a green extractant not only augmenting the leaching efficiency but also minimizing the usage of inorganic acids, proffering a better alternative for green recovery of waste LiBs in future.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652624010503; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141602; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85186767461&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0959652624010503; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141602
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know