The Role of Microbiota in Gastrointestinal Cancer and Cancer Treatment: Chance or Curse?
Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, ISSN: 2352-345X, Vol: 13, Issue: 3, Page: 857-874
2022
- 48Citations
- 94Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations48
- Citation Indexes47
- 47
- CrossRef22
- Policy Citations1
- Policy Citation1
- Captures94
- Readers94
- 94
Review Description
The gastrointestinal (GI) tract is home to a complex and dynamic community of microorganisms, comprising bacteria, archaea, viruses, yeast, and fungi. It is widely accepted that human health is shaped by these microbes and their collective microbial genome. This so-called second genome plays an important role in normal functioning of the host, contributing to processes involved in metabolism and immune modulation. Furthermore, the gut microbiota also is capable of generating energy and nutrients (eg, short-chain fatty acids and vitamins) that are otherwise inaccessible to the host and are essential for mucosal barrier homeostasis. In recent years, numerous studies have pointed toward microbial dysbiosis as a key driver in many GI conditions, including cancers. However, comprehensive mechanistic insights on how collectively gut microbes influence carcinogenesis remain limited. In addition to their role in carcinogenesis, the gut microbiota now has been shown to play a key role in influencing clinical outcomes to cancer immunotherapy, making them valuable targets in the treatment of cancer. It also is becoming apparent that, besides the gut microbiota’s impact on therapeutic outcomes, cancer treatment may in turn influence GI microbiota composition. This review provides a comprehensive overview of microbial dysbiosis in GI cancers, specifically esophageal, gastric, and colorectal cancers, potential mechanisms of microbiota in carcinogenesis, and their implications in diagnostics and cancer treatment.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352345X21001806; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmgh.2021.08.013; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85123696685&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34506954; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2352345X21001806; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmgh.2021.08.013; https://www.cmghjournal.org/article/S2352-345X(21)00180-6/fulltext#.YUHAsGQbVB0.twitter; http://www.cmghjournal.org/article/S2352345X21001806/abstract; http://www.cmghjournal.org/article/S2352345X21001806/fulltext; http://www.cmghjournal.org/article/S2352345X21001806/pdf; https://www.cmghjournal.org/article/S2352-345X(21)00180-6/abstract; https://www.cmghjournal.org/article/S2352-345X(21)00180-6/fulltext#.Yk_qAKYD7Vo.twitter; https://www.cmghjournal.org/article/S2352-345X%2821%2900180-6/fulltext?utm_medium=Social&utm_campaign=AGA-posts&utm_source=twitter; https://www.cmghjournal.org/article/S2352-345X(21)00180-6/fulltext
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know