Ultrasound-mediated delivery of novel tau-specific monoclonal antibody enhances brain uptake but not therapeutic efficacy
Journal of Controlled Release, ISSN: 0168-3659, Vol: 349, Page: 634-648
2022
- 13Citations
- 28Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations13
- Citation Indexes13
- 13
- CrossRef1
- Captures28
- Readers28
- 28
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- 1
Most Recent News
Ultrasound-mediated delivery of novel tau-specific monoclonal antibody enhances brain uptake but not therapeutic efficacy.
J Control Release. 2022 Jul 27;349:634-648. Authors: Bajracharya R, Cruz E, Götz J, Nisbet RM PubMed: 35901857 Submit Comment
Article Description
Tau-specific immunotherapy is an attractive strategy for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease and other tauopathies. However, effectively targeting tau in the brain remains a considerable challenge due to the restrictive nature of the blood-brain barrier (BBB), which excludes an estimated >99% of peripherally administered antibodies. However, their transport across the BBB can be facilitated by a novel modality, low-intensity scanning ultrasound used in combination with intravenously injected microbubbles (SUS +MB ). We have previously shown that SUS +MB -mediated delivery of a tau-specific antibody in a single-chain (scFv) format to tau transgenic mice enhanced brain and neuronal uptake and subsequently, reduced tau pathology and improved behavioural outcomes to a larger extent than either scFv or SUS +MB on its own. Here we generated a novel tau-specific monoclonal antibody, RNF5, and validated it in its IgG format in the presence or absence of SUS +MB by treating K369I tau transgenic K3 mice once weekly for 12 weeks. We found that both RNF5 and SUS +MB treatments on their own significantly reduced tau pathology. In the combination group (RNF5 + SUS +MB ), however, despite increased antibody localization in the brain, there were no further reductions in tau pathology when compared to RNF5 treatment alone. Furthermore, following SUS +MB, RNF5 accumulated heavily within cells across the pyramidal cell layer of the hippocampus, that were negative for MAP2 and p-tau, suggesting that SUS +MB may not facilitate enhanced RNF5 engagement of intraneuronal tau. Overall, our new findings reveal the complexities of combining tau immunotherapy with SUS +MB and challenge the view that this is a straight-forward approach.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016836592200445X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.07.026; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85134843801&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35901857; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S016836592200445X; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.07.026
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know