Differences in nasal and temporal responses of the cornea after photorefractive keratectomy
Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, ISSN: 0886-3350, Vol: 31, Issue: 1, Page: 30-38
2005
- 22Citations
- 24Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations22
- Citation Indexes22
- 22
- CrossRef13
- Captures24
- Readers24
- 24
Article Description
To examine the differences in the biomechanical response of the peripheral regions of the cornea after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). Department of Ophthalmology, Catholic University of Rome, Rome, Italy. Preoperative and 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month postoperative corneal topographies of 70 eyes that had PRK with the Technolas 217C excimer laser (Bausch & Lomb) were obtained. The eyes were divided into 4 groups according to the preoperative spherical equivalent refraction. Preoperative and follow-up topographic data were imported into custom software that computed the average composite corneal map and difference maps in each group to scientifically evaluate the corneal response to the surgery. The software was also used to analyze regional corneal changes after the laser ablation. Corneal peripheries up to 9.0 mm were evaluated. The preoperative corneas had a flatter nasal periphery than temporal periphery. The corneal surfaces in the right eyes and left eyes showed a mirror symmetry. Significant differences in the regional response of the cornea were observed ( P <.05), with a greater increase in the curvature of the nasal periphery than in the temporal periphery. To refine modeling of the cornea, the different regional anatomic features and biomechanical responses must be considered. Modifying existing ablation algorithms to compensate for the differences between nasal and temporal corneal flattening of the preoperative corneal surface and between the nasal and temporal responses may improve the postoperative corneal shape and quality of peripheral optics.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0886335004010053; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.10.026; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=13844310365&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15721694; https://journals.lww.com/02158034-200501000-00029; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.10.026
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know