A novel quantified palatability evaluation method (saliva evaluation combined with electronic tongue evaluation) for Traditional Chinese Medicine oral formulations based on oral stimulation
Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology, ISSN: 1773-2247, Vol: 74, Page: 103562
2022
- 5Citations
- 14Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Most Recent News
New Traditional Chinese Medicine Study Findings Have Been Reported from Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine [A Novel Quantified Palatability Evaluation Method (Saliva Evaluation Combined With Electronic Tongue Evaluation) for ...]
2022 DEC 21 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Fitness & Wellness Daily -- Data detailed on Complementary and Alternative Medicine -
Article Description
This study investigates the usefulness of saliva determination for the palatability evaluation of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) oral formulations as a complement to the electronic tongue (E-tongue) method. In this study, the response threshold and intensity of saliva amount evaluation method on different concentration of five taste standard substances was verified with the human sense and E-tongue sense. Fifty-eight kinds of TCM oral formulations and basic taste substances were utilized to assess the applicability of the novel method, which compared with the results of E-tongue evaluation. According to the PCA map, the oral stimulation of TCM oral formulations were divided into three groups (Group 1: SM < 0.05; Group 2: SM = 0.05; Group 3: SM > 0.05). In this study, the results of PLS revealed that the responses of E-tongue sensors could be characterized 71.9% of the SM information (R 2 = 71.9%). These showed that the taste stimulation of TCM had certain influence in SM. And the sensors of CA, JE, GA, and HA were critical parameters on palatability evaluation of TCM oral formulations. In conclusion, SM can be used to characterize the chemical and mechanical senses of TCM oral formulation. And it can be predicted the palatability of TCM according to the classification results of E-tongue.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1773224722004737; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2022.103562; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85133680595&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1773224722004737; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2022.103562
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know