Manganese doped goethite: Structural, optical and adsorption properties
Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, ISSN: 2213-3437, Vol: 2, Issue: 1, Page: 434-443
2014
- 32Citations
- 32Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Pure and manganese doped (0.22–1.87 wt.%) goethite (α-FeOOH) samples were prepared by co-precipitation method. The structural properties of the samples were studied using XRD, Raman, TG-DTA, UV–vis and TEM techniques. The XRD patterns of all the samples confirmed goethite to be the only crystalline phase. The lattice parameters ‘ a ’ and ‘ c ’ steadily decreased, whereas ‘ b ’ increased with the increase of Mn(II) content due to Jahn Teller effect. Raman spectra showed a strong peak at 399 cm −1 with other prominent peaks at 242, 292, 479, and a very small broad peak 550 cm −1 for the pure goethite sample. The observed blue and red shifts of peak positions after Mn(II) doping in Raman spectra have been attributed to phonon confinement, strain, defects and distortion in crystal structure. The DTA peak corresponding to decomposition of goethite to hematite shifted to higher temperature (320–335 °C) due to Mn(II) doping. Distinct changes in the size and geometrical shape of Mn-substituted α-FeOOH particles were observed in SEM micrographs. The TEM image of pure goethite revealed the acicular particles to be nano range. Depending on Mn(II) concentration in goethite matrix, red shifts were observed in the UV–vis spectra. The indirect bandgaps for all the samples were at relatively lower energy levels than the direct bandgaps. Adsorption capacities of Pb(II), Cd(II), Cu(II) and Zn(II) on Mn doped sample (0.43% Mn) showed two- to three-fold increase when compared to undoped goethite.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213343714000037; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2014.01.001; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84894229743&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2213343714000037; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2014.01.001
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know