Practice as you Teach: Comparing Ordering Practices Between Shared and Physician-Only Visits in Academically Affiliated Community Emergency Departments
The Journal of Emergency Medicine, ISSN: 0736-4679, Vol: 66, Issue: 2, Page: 170-176
2024
- 1Citations
- 4Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
- CrossRef1
- Captures4
- Readers4
Article Description
Considerable variability exists in emergency physicians’ (EPs) rates of resource utilization, which may cluster in distinct patterns. However, previous studies have focused on academic and tertiary care centers, and it is unclear whether similar patterns exist in community practice. Our aim was to examine whether EPs practicing in community emergency departments (EDs) have practice patterns similar to those of academic EDs. Secondarily, we sought to investigate the effects of shared visits with advanced practice professionals and residents. This was a retrospective study of two community EDs affiliated with an academic network. There were 62,860 visits among 50 EPs analyzed from October 1, 2018 through January 31, 2020 for rates of advanced imaging, admission, and shared visits. To classify practice patterns, we used a Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM), with groups and covariance determined by Bayesian Information Criteria. Our GMM revealed three groups. The largest had homogeneous patterns of resource use (n = 28; 50% were female; years of experience: 7; interquartile range [IQR] 2–11; advanced imaging: 28%; admission: 19%; shared: 34%), a small group with lower resource use (n = 4; 0% were female; years of experience: 6; IQR 4–10; advanced imaging: 28%; admission: 16%; shared: 8%), and a modest high-resource group (n = 18; 28% female; years of experience: 5; IQR 2–16; advanced imaging: 34%; admission: 23%; shared: 43%). Rates of shared visits had little direct correlation with imaging ( r 2 = 0.045) or admission ( r 2 = 0.093), and rates of imaging and admission were weakly correlated ( r 2 = 0.242). Our data suggest that community EPs may have multiple patterns of resource use, similar to those in academic EDs.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736467923004997; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2023.10.009; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85183570165&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38262781; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0736467923004997; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2023.10.009
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know