Carbon, energy and water footprints analysis of rapeseed oil production: A case study in China
Journal of Environmental Management, ISSN: 0301-4797, Vol: 287, Page: 112359
2021
- 29Citations
- 53Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
As the largest consumer of rapeseed oil in the world, China should consider the environmental effect of rapeseed oil production. However, only a few improvement measures have been proposed. To fill this gap, this study analyzed the energy, carbon and water footprints of rapeseed oil production based on the International Organization for Standardization standards using the framework of life cycle assessment. Results show that most of the energy, carbon, and water footprint of rapeseed oil production can be contributed to the direct processes of rapeseed cultivation, and the indirect processes of transport and fertilizer/diesel production. The value of energy and carbon footprints are calculated as 726.07 kg oil eq and 3889.75 kg CO 2 eq, respectively. For the water footprint, the values of acidification, aquatic eutrophication, carcinogens, freshwater ecotoxicity, water scarcity, and non-carcinogens are 14.24 kg SO 2 eq, 4.53 kg PO 4 −3 eq, 6.72 × 10 −5 Case, 5.43 × 10 4 PAF.m 3.d, 437.62 m 3 deprived, and 1.88 × 10 −5 case, respectively. Spatial analysis shows that the total environmental impacts of rapeseed production are concentrated in Sichuan, Hunan, Hubei, and Jiangxi Provinces. Correlation analysis reveals the positive correlation of human health and ecosystem quality with fertilizer application and pesticide loss. In general, the environmental effect can be effectively reduced by adjusting the industrial layout to shorten the distance of transport, improve the fine cultivation degree in low-yield areas, and decrease the use of pesticides in the hilly region of southern China.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479721004217; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112359; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85102804385&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33756212; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0301479721004217; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112359
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know