Energetic evaluation of phenol wastewater treatment by reverse electrodialysis reactor using different anodes
Journal of Environmental Management, ISSN: 0301-4797, Vol: 329, Page: 117089
2023
- 7Citations
- 17Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Most Recent News
Dalian University of Technology Reports Findings in Energy (Energetic evaluation of phenol wastewater treatment by reverse electrodialysis reactor using different anodes)
2023 JAN 10 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Energy Daily News -- New research on Energy is the subject of a
Article Description
Efficient electrode materials are essential to convert salinity gradient energy into oxidative degradation energy and electrical energy by reverse electrodialysis reactor (REDR). In this context, comparative experiments of REDR using different anodes (Ti/IrO 2 –RuO 2, Ti/PbO 2 and Ti/Ti 4 O 7 ) were conducted. The effects of output current and electrode rinse solution (ERS) flowrate on mineralization efficiency and energy output were discussed. Results demonstrated that the COD removal rate( η COD ) rose almost linearly with output current and ERS flowrate when using Ti/Ti 4 O 7 anode, but excessive operating conditions caused a slow increase or even decrease of η COD when using Ti/IrO 2 –RuO 2 or Ti/PbO 2 anodes. The order of electrode system potential loss ( E ele ) for the three anodes was Ti/Ti 4 O 7 > Ti/PbO 2 > Ti/IrO 2 –RuO 2. High E ele was beneficial to η COD but had a negative effect on the net output power ( P net ) of REDR. Regardless of the applied anodes, increasing the current and decreasing the ERS flowrate was detrimental to P net due to higher E ele. Based on these findings, four energy efficiency parameters were defined to evaluate energy recovery from multiple perspectives by linking energy output with mineralization capacity. They were electrode efficiency ( η ele ), energy efficiency ( EE ), general current efficiency ( GCE ) and energy consumption ( EC ), respectively. Results showed that REDR with Ti/Ti 4 O 7 anodes and suitable operating conditions achieved the optimal energy indicators and mineralization efficiency, which provided an efficient and economical option for wastewater treatment and energy recovery.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479722026627; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117089; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85144797611&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36565499; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0301479722026627; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117089
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know