Computational fluid dynamics modeling of floating treatment wetland retrofitted stormwater pond: Investigation on design configurations
Journal of Environmental Management, ISSN: 0301-4797, Vol: 337, Page: 117746
2023
- 4Citations
- 35Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Floating Treatment Wetland (FTW) is a cost-effective and easy-to-retrofit device for stormwater treatment. Its treatment efficiency largely depends on the fraction of inflow entering FTW and the residence time within it. Thus hydrodynamics play a crucial role, which is affected by the design configurations of FTW and stormwater pond. Despite a spike in research on FTWs, very little is known about how various design configurations affect treatment efficiency by an FTW. Our study hypothesizes that relative positions of FTW geometry, FTW position and pond inlet–outlet have impact on the hydrodynamics and as a consequence, treatment efficiency. To explore these design features, we employed computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling conducted in ANSYS Fluent, validated by experimental data to examine the impact of the aforementioned design features. The results revealed that circular FTW geometry positioned near inlet coupled with center inlet–side outlet configuration achieved the highest removal (94.8%) for a non-dimensional removal rate of k r t HRT = 20 ( k r is the first order removal rate in per day, t HRT is the nominal hydraulic residence time of the pond in days). Far side inlet–side outlet configuration performed the worst due to profound promotion of short-circuiting. FTW positioned near inlet performed better (61.8% mass removal on an average) than center (42.7%) and near outlet positions (54.1%) for k r t HRT = 20. Sensitivity analysis revealed that the treatment efficiency is most sensitive to inlet–outlet configurations. The design implications of this study will help practitioners achieving better water quality and ecological improvement goals.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479723005340; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117746; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85150358696&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36958285; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0301479723005340; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117746
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know