Inclusive greenhouse gas budget assessment in turfs: From turf production to disposal of grass clippings
Journal of Environmental Management, ISSN: 0301-4797, Vol: 346, Page: 118919
2023
- 26Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures26
- Readers26
- 26
Article Description
Globally, greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction is a serious concern. To evaluate whether turfs serve as a GHG sink or source, GHG budget assessments for life cycle are required. However, previous studies have only focused on the use of turfs. To bridge these gaps in literature, this study investigated GHG (CO 2, N 2 O, and CH 4 ) emissions from the disposal of grass clippings and soil GHG fluxes in turfs. Additionally, GHG budgets in the turf production phase were assessed. Finally, inclusive GHG budgets from turf production to disposal of grass clippings for four turf uses (soccer stadium, golf course, office, and urban park) were assessed. Grass clippings were disposed in three forms (incineration, leaving as-is, and biochar). We found that GHG emissions from incineration and leaving 1 t-fresh weight (FW) of grass clippings were 0.711 and 0.207 t-CO 2 e, respectively. Contrastingly, the GHG emissions from the biochar yield from 1 t-FW of grass clippings were −0.200 t-CO 2 e. Further, annual soil GHG fluxes in newly established Zoysia and Kentucky bluegrass turfs were calculated at 0.067 and 0.040 tCO 2 e・ha -1 ・yr -1, respectively. As the turf grass in production fields sequester large amounts of CO 2, GHG budgets in turf production phase were estimated at approximately −20 t-CO 2 e・ha -1 ・yr -1. Inclusive GHG budget assessment from turf production to disposal of grass clippings showed that turfs only in the urban parks served as a GHG sink and this ability was comparable to CO 2 sequestration in forests. To enhance the ability of GHG sinks and to promote changes from a GHG source to GHG sink, our study revealed the importance of reduction of GHG emissions from energy and resource uses (especially fertilizers and gasoline) for turf management.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479723017073; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118919; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85171375014&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37729836; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0301479723017073; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118919
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know