Unpacking greenwashing: The impact of environmental attitude, proactive strategies, and network embeddedness on corporate environmental performance
Journal of Environmental Management, ISSN: 0301-4797, Vol: 373, Page: 123625
2025
- 7Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures7
- Readers7
Article Description
Though there are considerable attention given to the consequences of greenwashing, however companies efforts to reduce greenwashing is still underexplored. Beside mounting pressures of stakeholders asking firms to revise their environmental orientation in order to reduce perceived greenwashing. Hence, the purpose of current study is to examine the impact of firms' environmental attitude, proactive environmental strategy, and network embeddedness on corporate environmental performance through perceived greenwashing. Also, the current study examines the moderating role of CEO green experience. The data for this study were collected from 523 managers employed in manufacturing companies located in China, specifically targeting regions with significant industrial activity and environmental challenges. To test the proposed hypotheses, structural equation modeling (SEM) was employed as it allows for the analysis of complex relationships between multiple variables simultaneously. The mediation effects of perceived greenwashing were evaluated using the bootstrapping method, which provides robust estimates of indirect effects and their statistical significance. Additionally, to examine the moderating role of CEO green experience, interaction moderation analysis was conducted, enabling the assessment of how variations in CEO environmental expertise influence the relationships between organizational factors and perceived greenwashing. Main findings show that firms’ environmental attitude, proactive environmental strategy, and network embeddedness reduce perceived greenwashing, consequently improving corporate environmental performance. Moreover, CEO green experience negatively moderates the relationship between environmental attitude, proactive environmental strategy, network embeddedness, and perceived greenwashing. These findings contribute to the greenwashing literature by identifying critical organizational factors—environmental attitude, proactive environmental strategy, and network embeddedness—that influence corporate environmental performance while mitigating perceptions of greenwashing. Furthermore, the study advances the upper echelons theory by demonstrating how CEO green experience moderates these relationships, emphasizing the role of leadership in shaping sustainability outcomes. This research is significant as it highlights actionable strategies for organizations to reduce greenwashing, thereby fostering stakeholder trust and improving long-term environmental performance. The study concludes with substantial practical implications for integrating sustainability into corporate strategies and leadership practices.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479724036119; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123625; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85211077938&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39644543; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0301479724036119; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123625
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know