Investigation of optimal feature for milling chatter identification using supervised machine learning techniques
Journal of Engineering Research, ISSN: 2307-1877, Vol: 12, Issue: 4, Page: 950-962
2024
- 2Citations
- 18Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In order to overcome the complex mathematical models and tedious analytical skills and improve the machining performance, various effective methods have been developed using time domain, frequency domain and time and frequency domain-based features. However, the selection of these features can be difficult, and results can be alleviated if it is wrongly selected. This study proposes a methodology that helps identify the optimal feature from eight time-domain statistical features using supervised machine learning algorithms. In this work, 44 milling experiments have been performed and labelled as chatter, transient, and stable states by observing the tool-machining condition. Subsequently, the eight time-domain-based features, i.e. mean, variance, peak-to-peak, root mean square, crest factor, form factor, kurtosis and skewness, have been calculated. After that, four machine learning techniques, i.e., random forest, gradient boosting, support vector machine and logistic regression, were utilized, and their accuracy score was 92.86 %, 96.8 %, 94.8 % and 91 %, respectively. After that, their feature score was evaluated to investigate the effectiveness of all 8 time domain-based features. Feature scores for mean, variance, peak-to-peak, root mean square, crest factor, form factor, kurtosis and skewness are 0.28, 0.25, 0.11, 0.095, 0.085, 0.08, 0.065 and 0.035, respectively. The outcome of this research is that peak-to-peak time domain-based features, along with gradient boosting, can extract chatter features in the presence of an extraneous noisy signal.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2307187723001463; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jer.2023.100138; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85186200294&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2307187723001463; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jer.2023.100138
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know