A simplified potential source density function based on predefined discretization
Journal of Engineering Research, ISSN: 2307-1877
2024
- 1Citations
- 3Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The potential source contribution function (PSCF) method is widely used in the analysis of air pollutant source areas, but it also faces several limitations. To address such limitations, the potential source density function (PSDF) method was developed based on Gaussian process regression (GPR). However, the PSDF model requires more computational resources than the PSCF model. Here, we present an enhanced model with improved speed. We discretized the PSDF method by assigning a predetermined spatial correlation between cells through a priori known correlation length scale. The time taken was reduced by 25–30% from that of the original PSDF method, while the values representing the air pollution sources exhibited only a slight difference from the original ones. Our new method reduces the time required for computational calculations, measures potential sources with comparable precision, and ensures the reliability and source intensity of the results.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2307187724000373; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jer.2024.02.009; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85186655940&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2307187724000373; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jer.2024.02.009
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know