Characterization of different hinge angles for swashplateless micro aerial robots
Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, ISSN: 2215-0986, Vol: 55, Page: 101750
2024
- 1Citations
- 2Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Micro Aerial Robots (MARs) are expected to increase their payload carrying capacity and flight time, and to serve in limited areas. These demands can only be met by developing new designs such as the swashplateless mechanism. By using the developed swashplateless mechanisms in aerial robots, the number of actuators and power consumption are reduced and payload carrying capacities are increased. Design criteria of swashplateless mechanisms should be determined according to the working conditions of aerial robots. In this paper, different hinge angles are characterized for aerial robots that will use the swashplateless passive mechanism. This characterization is investigated with respect to design criteria such as power consumption, thrust force and RPM and sound pressure level (SPL) of the swashplateless mechanism with different hinge angles. According to the results obtained, it was revealed that changes occurred in the thrust force characterizations of the mechanisms with different hinge angles before and after 1750 RPM. Similarly, it has been shown that a change in the power consumption behavior of passive mechanisms with different hinge angles occurs before and after the 0.8 N thrust force threshold value. The effect of determining the hinge angle in the swashplateless mechanism on the system performance is revealed. It has been shown that if the swashplateless mechanism is to be used in the aerial robot, it is necessary to first determine the working conditions during operational use and then determine the hinge angle in the passive mechanism.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215098624001368; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2024.101750; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85197421569&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2215098624001368; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2024.101750
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know