Modeling light scattering by spherical pores for calculating the transmittance of transparent ceramics – All you need to know
Journal of the European Ceramic Society, ISSN: 0955-2219, Vol: 41, Issue: 4, Page: 2169-2192
2021
- 38Citations
- 29Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Review Description
In this paper transmittance predictions based on residual pore scattering in transparent ceramics with cubic crystallites via Mie theory and its approximations (Rayleigh, Fraunhofer, van de Hulst and Rayleigh-Gans, including the small- and large-size limits) are recalled and systematically compared. Due to the high phase contrast, the difference between different types of ceramics is of secondary importance, so that the essential conclusions are of general validity for all types of transparent ceramics. It is shown that the Rayleigh-Gans approximation and its large-size limit provide surprisingly good transmittance predictions, although it has not often been used in the ceramic literature. The main conclusion of this paper is that, of all the approximations presented here and used in ceramic science so far, the van de Hulst approximation is the one that most closely approaches the exact Mie results, although it has been largely ignored in the literature on transparent ceramics so far.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955221920309456; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.11.046; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85097039282&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0955221920309456; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.11.046
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know