Development of a nutrient dataset based on a standardized approach for a nutrition survey conducted in the United Arab Emirates
Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, ISSN: 0889-1575, Vol: 100, Page: 103899
2021
- 3Citations
- 18Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
It is challenging to reduce errors in dietary assessment. It requires the use of a rigorous dietary assessment tool (DAT) and reliable food composition tables or food composition databases (FCTs/FCDBs) for calculating nutrient intake. As part of the validation study of a DAT to be used in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), we developed an FCT to calculate the nutrient composition of reported foods. We have described the process of matching 532 foods reported in three 24-h recalls (24-HRs) by a convenient sample of 60 volunteers using commercial nutrition analysis software “Nutritionist Pro™” to process reported foods and incorporating other sources of nutrient data when appropriate (FCDBs from FoodEXplorer Interface™, regional FCTs, PhD thesis, and recipe calculation). The food-matching process was standardized according to the Food and Agriculture Organization/International Network of Food Data Systems guidelines to harmonize the approach and minimize errors. This approach resulted in the adequate matching of 97 % of the reported foods. The United States Department of Agriculture Standard Reference (USDA SR) DB, recipe calculation and the United Kingdom DB were the primary sources of nutrient data. The use of high-quality DBs from different countries was adequate because UAE imports most foods from various countries worldwide.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889157521000995; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2021.103899; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85103716517&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0889157521000995; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2021.103899
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know