A subjective analysis of participants’ views in a study of experimental modelling of imposed airway obstruction in infants and children
Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, ISSN: 1752-928X, Vol: 88, Page: 102350
2022
- 6Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures6
- Readers6
Article Description
Deliberate airway obstruction is a well-recognised form of child abuse and one of the most common causes of death in cases of child homicide. Although classical signs such as petechial haemorrhages can be helpful in raising the suspicion of mechanical asphyxia, they are not always present. Therefore, distinguishing between bruising caused by accidents, medical conditions or non-accidental injury remains challenging. We aimed to characterise bruising patterns which are potentially more consistent with deliberate airway obstruction by means of an experimental modelling study. The first results of our project were previously published and demonstrated that bruising anywhere on the head may be consistent with deliberate upper airway obstruction. In this paper, we present the findings of a questionnaire carried out during the modelling to assess participants’ perception of force and consider how variables such as age, use of adjuncts and force distribution may affect bruising patterns in deliberate airway obstruction. Statistical analysis of our results showed that participants felt they were using less force in scenarios involving the infant rather than the child resuscitation dummy as well as when using adjuncts, meaning marks are likely to be more subtle. Therefore, in such cases it is important to examine for other signs of asphyxiation (such as petechiae) and consider the possibility that adjuncts might have been used which could make picking up localised injuries more difficult. Our results also showed that participants often felt force was not distributed evenly across the digits, reporting the greatest force through either the thumb in isolation or the thumb plus another digit in up to nearly 50% of cases. This suggests that just one or two bruises may be consistent with deliberate airway obstruction.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1752928X22000488; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2022.102350; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85127817858&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35398772; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1752928X22000488; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2022.102350
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know