Agreement between Fourier-domain and swept-source optical coherence tomography used for optic nerve head measurements
Journal Français d'Ophtalmologie, ISSN: 0181-5512, Vol: 43, Issue: 1, Page: 25-30
2020
- 3Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures3
- Readers3
Article Description
To assess the correlation between optic nerve head measurements generated by Fourier-domain (FD) and swept-source (SS) optical coherence tomography (OCT) both in healthy Caucasian subjects and patients with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG). This was a cross-sectional study of the right eyes of 118 subjects. In each participant, the measurements of disc area, cup to disc ratio (CDR), vertical cup to disc ratio (VCDR), rim area and rim volume were performed consecutively by FD-OCT and then SS-OCT. Participant age, gender and spherical equivalent were also recorded. Agreement between the two devices was assessed through intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland–Altman plots. The study sample consisted of 95 healthy eyes and 23 eyes with glaucoma. Mean participant age was 48.6 ± 20.0 years, 54.2% were female, and mean spherical equivalent was − 1.6 ± 3.0 diopters. FD-OCT and SS-OCT measurements were respectively: mean disc area 1.79 ± 0.3 vs 1.83 ± 0.3 mm2 (ICC = 0.71), mean CDR 0.38 ± 0.2 vs 0.33 ± 0.2 (ICC = 0.91), mean VCDR 0.58 ± 0.2 vs 0.52 ± 0.2 (ICC = 0.92), mean rim area 1.05 ± 0.4 mm 2 vs 1.03 ± 0.5 mm 2 (ICC = 0.29), and mean rim volume 0.14 ± 0.11 vs 0.21 ± 0.17 mm 3 (ICC = 0.53). Good agreement between the devices was noted for rim area and rim volume in glaucoma subjects (ICC = 0.76 and 0.68 respectively), while weak agreement was observed for these variables in healthy subjects (ICC ≤ 0.50). The CDR and VCDR measurements provided by FD and SS OCT showed excellent agreement for the overall sample. When the devices were used for rim measurements, agreement was excellent only in the POAG patients. Évaluer la concordance entre les mesures de la tête du nerf optique générées par la tomographie par cohérence optique (OCT) dans le domaine de Fourier (FD) et à swept source (SS), chez des sujets sains de type caucasien et des patients atteints de glaucome primitif à angle ouvert (GPAO). Il s’agissait d’une étude transversale des yeux droits de 118 sujets. Chez chaque participant, l’aire du disque optique, le rapport excavation/disque (CDR), le rapport excavation/disque vertical (VCDR), l’aire de l’anneau neurorétinien (ANR) et du volume de l’ANR ont été définis consécutivement par FD-OCT puis par SS-OCT. L’âge, le sexe et l’équivalent sphérique des participants ont également été enregistrés. L’accord entre les deux dispositifs a été évaluée à l’ aide de coefficients de corrélation intraclasse (ICC) et de diagrammes de Bland–Altman. L’échantillon de l’étude comprenait 95 yeux sains et 23 yeux atteints de glaucome. L’âge moyen des participants était de 48,6 ± 20,0 ans, dont 54,2 % de femmes et l’équivalent sphérique moyen de − 1,6 ± 3,0 dioptries. Les mesures FD-OCT et SS-OCT étaient respectivement: aire moyenne du disque 1,79 ± 0,3 et 1,83 ± 0,3 mm 2 (ICC = 0,71), CDR moyen 0,38 ± 0,2 et 0,33 ± 0,2 (ICC = 0,91), VCDR moyen 0,58 ± 0,2 et 0,52 ± 0,2 (ICC = 0,92), aire moyenne de l’ANR 1,05 ± 0,4 mm 2 et 1,03 ± 0,5 mm 2 (ICC = 0,29) et volume moyen de l’ANR 0,14 ± 0,11 et 0,21 ± 0,17 mm 3 (ICC = 0,53). Un bon accord entre les dispositifs a été noté pour l’aire et le volume de l’ANR chez les sujets atteints de glaucome (ICC = 0,76 et 0,68 respectivement), tandis qu’un faible accord était observé pour ces variables chez les sujets normaux (ICC ≤ 0,50). Les mesures CDR et VCDR fournies par FD et SS-OCT ont montré un excellent accord pour l’ensemble du groupe. Lorsque les appareils étaient utilisés pour mesurer les papilles, l’accord n’était excellent que chez les patients atteints de GPAO.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0181551219304395; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfo.2019.06.016; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85075400142&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31733916; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0181551219304395; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfo.2019.06.016
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know