Environmental Monitoring of Nebraska Ready-to-eat Meat Processing Establishments Resulted in the Isolation of Listeria Alongside Pseudomonas Highly Resistant to Quaternary Ammonia Sanitizer
Journal of Food Protection, ISSN: 0362-028X, Vol: 87, Issue: 12, Page: 100391
2024
- 2Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures2
- Readers2
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- News1
Most Recent News
Findings from University of Nebraska Provides New Data on Listeria (Environmental Monitoring of Nebraska Ready-to-eat Meat Processing Establishments Resulted In the Isolation Of Listeria Alongside Pseudomonas Highly
2024 DEC 05 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Ecology Daily News -- New research on Foodborne Diseases and Conditions - Listeria
Article Description
Robust environmental monitoring for Listeria monocytogenes often may not be feasible for small and very small meat processors in the United States due to the limitations in finances, staffing, or expertise. Three small/very small processors in Nebraska were sampled using sponge applicators in nonfood contact surface areas to determine if biofilm and sanitizer resistance behaviors of Pseudomonas could relate to the prevalence of L. monocytogenes and Listeria spp. in ready-to-eat meat processing environments. Samples were 3.3% (3/90) positive for L. monocytogenes, and 12.2% (11/90) of samples were positive for Listeria spp. Pseudomonas spp. were also isolated. When Listeria spp. and Pseudomonas spp. were assayed for biofilm production and resistance to a quaternary ammonia sanitizer, multiple isolates belonging to both genera capable of forming biofilms were identified. Four Pseudomonas spp. isolates resisted the 200 ppm manufacturer-recommended sanitizer concentration for food contact surface sanitation, and one Pseudomonas spp. isolated from a drain sample that was also positive for L. monocytogenes demonstrated a sanitizer minimum bactericidal concentration of 1000 ppm. These findings further support the need for monitoring of small and very small meat processors for L. monocytogenes as well as highlight the need to identify other bacteria in these processing environments, like Pseudomonas, that are resistant to environmental stressors.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X24001753; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100391; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85208387776&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39490688; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0362028X24001753
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know