Detection of tet (X6) variant–producing Proteus terrae subsp . cibarius from animal cecum in Zhejiang, China
Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance, ISSN: 2213-7165, Vol: 29, Page: 124-130
2022
- 9Citations
- 19Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations9
- Citation Indexes9
- Captures19
- Readers19
- 19
Article Description
The prevalence of tet (X) genes threatens the clinical use of last-line tigecycline. The tet (X6) gene has been reported in Proteus strains, but its genetic context is rarely reported. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and genetic contexts of tet (X6) gene in Proteus spp. A tet (X6) variant–bearing P. terrae subsp. cibarius strain was subjected to susceptibility testing, determination of growth curves, scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy and whole-genome sequencing (WGS). The genomic contexts of the tet (X6)-positive strain were analysed by sequence comparison and annotation. ZJ19PC, a P. terrae subsp. cibarius strain harbouring the tet (X6) variant, was isolated from 20 cecum samples collected in Zhejiang, China. The chromosome size of ZJ19PC was 3 952 084 bp; the GC content was 38.2%; and hugA, sul2, tet (H), floR, dfra1, aadA1, aac(3)-IV and aph(4)-la were found in addition to the tet (X6) variant. Proteus spp. could be classified into three groups based on the tet (X6) gene contexts. Strain ZJ19PC belongs to group 1 ( sra - sul2 -IS CR2 - floR -IS CR2 - floR -IS CR2 - tet (X6) variant- tnpA -IS Ec59 - aph(4)-la - aac(3)-Iva -IS 26 ), and this region of group 1 was inserted between modA and guaA. The common antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes of the three types of AMR gene islands were sul2, floR, tet (X6) and aac(3). The tet (X6) gene contexts and SNP tree showed that ZJ19PC was homologous to HNCF44W and HNCF43W, which indicated that these strains may be clonally transmitted. This study analysed the genetic contexts of the tet (X6) gene in Proteus spp. and highlighted the significance of monitoring tigecycline-resistant P. terrae subsp. cibarius.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213716522000455; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jgar.2022.02.011; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85127102769&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35218939; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2213716522000455; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jgar.2022.02.011
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know