Erratum to: “Evaluating oral and inhalation bioaccessibility of indoor dust-borne short- and median-chain chlorinated paraffins using in vitro Tenax-assisted physiologically based method” [J. Hazard. Mater. 402 (2021) 123449]
Journal of Hazardous Materials, ISSN: 0304-3894, Vol: 405, Page: 124233
2021
- 1Citations
- 3Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
- CrossRef1
- Captures3
- Readers3
Correction Description
In the work published in Journal of Hazardous Materials (volume 402, 2020, 123449), there was an error in the section of “2.5. Inhalation bioaccessibility measurement”. Current incorrect version: “According to PBET by Kademoglou et al. (2018), 0.1 g of spiked dust sample was combined in 50 mL glass tube with 20 mL of each artificial lung fluid separately, incubated at 37 °C, and shaken at 150 rpm for 15 days, which basically represented the long-term retention of inhaled particles in the human lung (Boisa et al., 2014; Sturm, 2007; Zeng et al., 2019).” Corrected version. “The procedure used for lung simulation was modified from those described by Kademoglou et al. (2018) and Xie et al. (2018). In brief, 0.1 g of spiked dust sample was combined in 50 mL glass tube with 20 mL of each artificial lung fluid separately, incubated at 37 °C, and shaken at 150 rpm for 15 days, which basically represented the long-term retention of inhaled particles in the human lung (Boisa et al., 2014; Sturm, 2007; Zeng et al., 2019).” None of the results or the conclusions of the paper are affected by this erratum. The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304389420322238; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124233; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85095989722&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33191033; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0304389420322238; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124233
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know