Girls unwanted – The role of parents’ child-specific sex preference for children’s early mental development
Journal of Health Economics, ISSN: 0167-6296, Vol: 82, Page: 102590
2022
- 5Citations
- 56Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations5
- Citation Indexes5
- CrossRef4
- Captures56
- Readers56
- 56
Article Description
We propose a novel son preference measure that relates the preference to a specific child. We find child-specific son preference to be more common among later born children and in families with fewer sons. Using the novel measure and an interaction instrumental variables approach, we estimate a penalty in early mental functions for unwanted girls of 0.7 standard deviations. This penalty appears to be partially driven by discrimination against girls and partially by pampering of boys. Children’s health and parental inputs do not mediate the effect from son preference to mental development. Our findings highlight the relevance of parents’ attitudes for a nurturing home environment and healthy brain development.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167629622000108; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2022.102590; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85124066790&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35139435; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0167629622000108; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2022.102590
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know