Prediction of impending central-line-associated bloodstream infections in hospitalized cardiac patients: development and testing of a machine-learning model
Journal of Hospital Infection, ISSN: 0195-6701, Vol: 127, Page: 44-50
2022
- 7Citations
- 47Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations7
- Citation Indexes7
- Captures47
- Readers47
- 47
Article Description
While modelling of central-line-associated blood stream infection (CLABSI) risk factors is common, models that predict an impending CLABSI in real time are lacking. To build a prediction model which identifies patients who will develop a CLABSI in the ensuing 24 h. We collected variables potentially related to infection identification in all patients admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit or cardiac ward at Boston Children's Hospital in whom a central venous catheter (CVC) was in place between January 2010 and August 2020, excluding those with a diagnosis of bacterial endocarditis. We created models predicting whether a patient would develop CLABSI in the ensuing 24 h. We assessed model performance based on area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity and false-positive rate (FPR) of models run on an independent testing set (40%). A total of 104,035 patient-days and 139,662 line-days corresponding to 7468 unique patients were included in the analysis. There were 399 positive blood cultures (0.38%), most commonly with Staphylococcus aureus (23% of infections). Major predictors included a prior history of infection, elevated maximum heart rate, elevated maximum temperature, elevated C-reactive protein, exposure to parenteral nutrition and use of alteplase for CVC clearance. The model identified 25% of positive cultures with an FPR of 0.11% (AUC = 0.82). A machine-learning model can be used to predict 25% of patients with impending CLABSI with only 1.1/1000 of these predictions being incorrect. Once prospectively validated, this tool may allow for early treatment or prevention.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195670122001906; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2022.06.003; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85133739308&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35738317; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0195670122001906; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2022.06.003
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know