Modified Wassel-Flatt Type III Radial Polydactyly: Subtypes and Their Outcomes
The Journal of Hand Surgery, ISSN: 0363-5023, Vol: 49, Issue: 1, Page: 60.e1-60.e8
2024
- 2Citations
- 5Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations2
- Citation Indexes2
- Captures5
- Readers5
Article Description
We aimed to subdivide modified type III radial polydactyly and evaluate the applied surgical procedures and outcomes according to the subtypes. This study included 32 thumbs of 32 patients treated for modified Wassel-Flatt type III radial polydactyly from March 2008 to December 2018. Each patient was subclassified into parallel, divergent, and convergent types according to the alignment of the duplicated digit. The parallel type was further divided according to the treatment method applied. The parallel A group comprised patients treated with reconstructing the radial collateral ligament of the interphalangeal (IP) joint after removing only the distal phalanx and preserving the proximal phalanx of the extra digit, and the parallel B group comprised patients treated with excision of the extra digit at the bifurcation site of the proximal phalanx. We evaluated the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand scores and radiographic angulation of the IP and metacarpophalangeal joints at a mean follow-up of 38 months. Fourteen cases were parallel type (6 and 8 in the parallel A and B groups, respectively), 14 were divergent type, and 4 were convergent type. Patients in the parallel A group had significantly better IP and metacarpophalangeal joint angulation and Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand scores than those in the parallel B group. Patients in the parallel A group had significantly better Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand scores than those in the divergent and convergent groups. Reconstructing the radial collateral ligament of the IP joint after removing only the distal phalanx and preserving the proximal phalanx of the extra digit was associated with better outcomes than the excision of the extra digit at the bifurcation site in the parallel type cases. The parallel type treated with proximal phalanx preservation and ligament reconstruction had better clinical outcomes than other types of modified Wassel-Flatt type III radial polydactyly. Prognostic IV.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036350232200291X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.04.024; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85133685565&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35803781; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S036350232200291X; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.04.024
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know