Exploring porous sulfur copolymers for efficient removal of heavy metal ions from wastewater: A computational study
Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, ISSN: 1226-086X, Vol: 138, Page: 365-379
2024
- 7Citations
- 12Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of porous sulfur copolymers (PSSD and NaSD) in adsorbing heavy metals from wastewater through an inverse vulcanization process. A computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model is developed and validated with experimental data to analyze the heavy metal removal by these materials. The results indicate that Arsenic ions exhibit the highest adsorption capacity compared to cadmium, mercury, and lead, indicating a stronger affinity of porous materials for arsenic ions. Lead ions show lower adsorption due to their larger ionic radius and lower charge density in PSSD. The CFD modeling assesses the adsorption process based on material position, revealing that in PSSD, maximum adsorption occurs at 1.5 cm thickness, while in NaSD, lead inhibits adsorption around 1 cm, with other metals continuing slow adsorption until 2 cm. The results also indicate that two parameter isothermal models indicate that the Langmuir model best fits the adsorption data and three isothermal models stipulate that the sips model is suitable for adsorption data. In the case of PSSD, the maximum adsorption trend is; Arsenic (289 µg/g) > cadmium (228 µg/g) > mercury (207 µg/g) > lead (188 µg/g) ions, respectively. The adsorption efficiency of adsorbents is 60–85 % for heavy metal ions removal. This study holds promise for industrial applications due to the availability of bulk sulfur for porous copolymer production. Leveraging CFD simulations enables rapid determination of optimal process parameters tailored to individual chemical plants, thereby enhancing operational efficiency. This groundbreaking approach enables accurate prediction of adsorption data for various heavy metals under consistent conditions, revolutionizing industrial applications.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1226086X24002533; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2024.04.014; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85190257278&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1226086X24002533; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2024.04.014
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know