Bayesian networks supporting management practices: A multifaceted perspective based on the literature
International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, ISSN: 2667-0968, Vol: 4, Issue: 1, Page: 100231
2024
- 3Citations
- 34Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Bayesian network is a probabilistic graphical model within machine learning that supports decision-making under conditions of uncertainty in different domains. Although the scientific literature has increasingly addressed the implementation of Bayesian networks to support management practices (BNM), a thorough review is currently lacking. This bibliometric review investigates the transformative potential of Bayesian networks in reshaping decision-making paradigms across multidisciplinary domains. The knowledge set findings reveal a predominant focus on risk management within the Engineering domain; the scientific openings involve significant progress in both theoretical frameworks and practical applications across Computer Science, Engineering, Medicine, and Environmental Science; and research trends indicate a progressive BNM within Engineering and Medicine, contrasting with a decline in innovative studies related to Computer Science. This study acts as a catalyst, propelling inventive BNM applications and fostering interdisciplinary advancements. It lays a foundation for pioneering BNM strategies.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266709682400020X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2024.100231; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85189102157&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S266709682400020X; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2024.100231
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know