Layered and subregional control strategy based on model-free adaptive iterative learning for laser additive manufacturing process
Journal of Manufacturing Processes, ISSN: 1526-6125, Vol: 102, Page: 806-813
2023
- 4Citations
- 7Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Improving stability in process and the quality of manufactured parts is critical to laser additive manufacturing (LAM). Developing appropriate control methods is essential for this purpose. Layered control approaches are commonly utilized in current research on LAM process control, with a primary focus on the pattern of layer-by-layer deposition. However, these strategies might neglect the dynamic and evolving characteristics of the process along the scanning direction. Due to the complex nature of the LAM process, such layered control approaches could be inadequate in addressing intra-layer instability, potentially resulting in metallurgical defects. To overcome these limitations, we propose a layered-and-subregional model-free adaptive iterative learning control (LS-MFAILC) method. Considering the cyclic and the layer-by-layer processing principle of LAM, we develop a subregional control strategy and integrate it with a layered control framework. In addition, the model-free adaptive iterative learning control (MFAILC) algorithm is utilized as the controller due to its ability to control complex and time-varying systems with repetitive running characteristics. In the proposed method, each target layer to be printed in process is divided into multiple non-overlapping regions along the scanning direction, and the process parameters for each region are adaptively controlled based on historical information acquired from previous layers during the process. The temperature information of the melt pool is captured and extracted using a thermal imager integrated with the printing system. Experimental results and comparison with the layered control approach demonstrate the effectiveness and superiority of our method.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1526612523007715; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2023.07.080; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85167410792&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1526612523007715; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2023.07.080
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know