The generation mechanism of cutting heat and the theoretical prediction model for temperature on the rake face of the cutting tool in Zirconia ceramics
Journal of Manufacturing Processes, ISSN: 1526-6125, Vol: 132, Page: 584-597
2024
- 1Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures1
- Readers1
Article Description
Cutting temperature and its distribution are crucial factors influencing tool strength and wear rate, due to the hardness and brittleness of Zirconia (Z r O 2 ) ceramics, significant challenges arise in both direct temperature measurement in the cutting zone and theoretical analysis of cutting heat. Thus, focusing on the turning characteristics of Z r O 2 ceramics, this study analyzes the mechanism of cutting heat generation and proposes utilizing thermodynamic state equations to determine the cutting heat source on rake face of tool. Based on the heat source method, a theoretically prediction model for temperature distribution on rake face is established. This model considers primary cutting parameters, workpiece material properties, crack fracture characteristics of the machined surface, and thermal characterizations of the tool material. The relationship between tool wear and cutting temperature is experimentally analyzed to determine the characteristic temperature that indicates the initial stage of tool wear. The validity of the theoretical model is verified, as the predicted results show high consistency with experimental results within the range of experimental parameters, with a relative error within 15.2 %.The results reveal the highest temperature during brittle cutting occurs within the cutting layer area, with the highest temperature occurring approximately 50 μm from the tool tip, followed by a gradual decrease beyond 150-200 μm. This study also demonstrates that cutting heat in ceramic turning does not solely originate from friction heat between tool flank-workpiece but also includes impact heat from tool rake face-workpiece, which under certain cutting parameters exerts a more significant influence on cutting temperature. This model can facilitate the selection and optimization of cutting process parameters for brittle materials and provide a theoretical basis for analyzing the relationship between tool thermal damage, thermophysical properties, and tool wear.
Bibliographic Details
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know