Computational screening and design of S100B ligand to block S100B–p53 interaction
Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling, ISSN: 1093-3263, Vol: 27, Issue: 8, Page: 969-977
2009
- 11Citations
- 19Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations11
- Citation Indexes11
- 11
- CrossRef9
- Captures19
- Readers19
- 19
Article Description
The binding of S100B to p53 disables the biological function of p53 as a tumor suppressor and thus causes cancer. It is very important to explore the interaction between S100B and p53 and to develop inhibitors to block the interaction in anti-cancer development. In this work, the interaction of S100B to p53 was studied using molecular dynamics (MD) at the atomic level and organic molecules have been identified as potential inhibitors to block the S100B–p53 interaction. It was indicated in the simulations that S100B residues around GLU45 and GLU46 play an important role in the binding of S100B to p53. The three dimensional structure of S100B obtained from S100B–p53 complex (PDB ID: 1DT7) was used as the target protein receptor. Multiple LUDI screenings for S100B ligands were performed using different searching radii 6.23 Å, 7.23 Å, 8.23 Å, 9.23 Å and 10.23 Å with a searching center which was defined as the geometrical center of S100B residues that are within 5 Å from the p53 C-terminal peptide in the complex. Potential organic compounds were screened from the ZINC database using LUDI program implemented in Cerius2 package and evaluated as potential S100B ligands to block the S100B–p53 interaction. The top-scored compounds were selected for binding affinity calculation. The results show that these top-scored ZINC compounds bind in the location where p53 binds and interact with S100B in a similar fashion as p53, and therefore it is expected that they have the potential to block S100B from binding to p53. The ADME and toxicity properties of the potential S100B ligands were also evaluated.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1093326309000370; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmgm.2009.02.006; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=67349279571&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19324580; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1093326309000370; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmgm.2009.02.006
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know