Fourier and Laplace-like low-field NMR spectroscopy: The perspectives of multivariate and artificial neural networks analyses
Journal of Magnetic Resonance, ISSN: 1090-7807, Vol: 324, Page: 106915
2021
- 13Citations
- 19Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations13
- Citation Indexes13
- 13
- CrossRef6
- Captures19
- Readers19
- 19
Article Description
Low field Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (LF-NMR) is a rich source of information for a wide range of samples types. These can be hard or soft solids, such as plastics or elastomers; bulk liquids or liquids absorbed in porous materials, and can come from biomaterials, biological tissues, archaeological artifacts, cultural heritage objects. LF-NMR instruments present a significant advance especially for in situ, ex situ and in vivo measurement of relaxation and diffusion. Moreover, high resolution 1D and 2D spectroscopy, as well as magnetic resonance (MR) imaging are available in these fields. In this work we discuss the advanced analysis of the data measured in LF-NMR from the perspectives of tertiary level that implies the analysis on principal components (PCA), and on the quaternary analysis that uses an artificial neural network (ANN). The principles of PCA and ANN are largely discussed. For the PCA analysis, a series of 52 spectra were analyzed, having been recorded in vivo by LF-NMR. Of these spectra, 38 were generated from normal uterus, 7 by uterus tissue with endometrial cancer, and another 7 were obtained from tissues of women with uterine cervical cancer. The PC1 vs PC2 plot was further analyzed using an artificial neural network, and the results are presented as 2D maps of probability. Furthermore, the perspectives of applying an ANN to solve the problem of Laplace-like inversion are discussed. An example of such ANN was presented and the performance was discussed. Finally, a model of complex ANN, capable to sequentially solve this kind of problems specific to LF-NMR is proposed and discussed.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090780721000045; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2021.106915; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85101508451&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33648679; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1090780721000045; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2021.106915
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know