Welding characterization evolutions for dual spot laser welded-brazed Al/steel joint with various spot configurations
Journal of Materials Research and Technology, ISSN: 2238-7854, Vol: 19, Page: 697-708
2022
- 17Citations
- 12Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In this research, satisfactory Al/steel butt joint was obtained by the dual spot laser welding-brazing technology with various spot configurations (+45° biased to steel side, in-line, -45° biased to Al side). The results showed that the interfacial IMC (Intermetallic compound) were composed of η–Fe 2 (Al,Si) 5 and θ–Fe(Al,Si) 3 for three joints. The interfacial IMC thickness reduced when the laser spot was biased from steel to Al side. In addition, IMC with larger thickness was produced at the top and middle regions than that of bottom region. The η–Fe 2 (Al,Si) 5 /steel interface would be changed from straight to finger-shaped with the reduction of η–Fe 2 (Al,Si) 5 layer thickness. Numerical simulation showed that interfacial IMC thickness variations were resulted from the difference of peak temperatures: higher peak temperatures, thicker interfacial IMC. Analysis of fractured behaviors presented that fractured locations would be changed with the reduction interfacial IMC thickness: from η–Fe 2 (Al,Si) 5 layer to η–Fe 2 (Al,Si) 5 layer and θ–Fe(Al,Si) 3 and finally to θ–Fe(Al,Si) 3 and partial weld seam when interfacial IMC thickness reduced from 6.1 μm to 5.1 μm and finally to 3.4 μm. Tensile strength values showed that fractured location of θ–Fe(Al,Si) 3 and partial weld seam in the interface joined with 2.9–3.5 μm Fe 2 (Al,Si) 5 layer and θ–Fe(Al,Si) 3 was most beneficial for interfacial strength and highest tensile strength of 142 MPa was obtained.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2238785422007359; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.05.073; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85137587982&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2238785422007359; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.05.073
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know