The importance of habitat selection for the reintroduction of the endangered Salix lapponum L. in eastern Poland
Journal for Nature Conservation, ISSN: 1617-1381, Vol: 54, Page: 125785
2020
- 7Citations
- 15Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
We present a procedure for selecting and verifying the optimal location for establishing a new population of the relict species Salix lapponum in eastern Poland. We aimed to demonstrate the importance of an approach combining the results of multifaceted analyses with the subjective experience and judgment of a practitioner. We began by selecting 30 historically known sites of the species and chose the optimal one for the reintroduction process. The reintroduction of S. lapponum in the site ultimately chosen proved satisfactory with respect to plant survival. This was the first trial of this type conducted in peat bogs situated in eastern Poland. We believe that in addition to sound knowledge of the biology and ecology of the species, current data on the habitat conditions in the area selected for transplantation are necessary as well. Suitable statistical analyses should be applied, but their value will increase with the amount and variety of available data on the habitat at the initial stage of selection. The experience and intuition of a practitioner making the final choice of reintroduction site may prove to be crucial, so its importance should be emphasized.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1617138119302729; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2020.125785; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85077650987&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1617138119302729; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2020.125785
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know