Strategies for interfacing with the trigeminal nerves in rodents for bioelectric medicine
Journal of Neuroscience Methods, ISSN: 0165-0270, Vol: 324, Page: 108321
2019
- 12Citations
- 45Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations12
- Citation Indexes12
- 12
- CrossRef5
- Captures45
- Readers45
- 45
Article Description
Bioelectric medicine seeks to modulate neural activity via targeted electrical stimulation to treat disease. Recent clinical evidence supports trigeminal nerve stimulation as a bioelectric treatment for several neurological disorders; however, the mechanisms of trigeminal nerve stimulation and potential side effects remain largely unknown. The goal of this study is to optimize the methodology and reproducibility of neural interface implantation for mechanistic studies in rodents. This article describes a single incision surgical approach to the infraorbital nerve of rats and mice and the supraorbital nerve in rats for trigeminal nerve stimulation studies. This article also presents the use of cortical evoked potentials and electromyography as methods for demonstrating effective engagement between the implanted electrode and target nerve. A number of surgical approaches to the infraorbital nerve in rats exist, many of which are technically difficult. A simple, standardized approach to infraorbital nerve in rats and mice, as well as the supraorbital nerve of rats is integral to reproducibility of future trigeminal nerve stimulation studies. The infraorbital nerve of rats and mice can be easily accessed from a single dorsal incision on the bridge of the nose that avoids major anatomical structures such as the facial nerve. The supraorbital nerve is also accessible in rats from a single dorsal incision, but not mice due to size. Successful interfacing and engagement of the infra- and supraorbital nerves using the described methodology is demonstrated by recording of evoked cortical potentials and electromyography.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165027019301797; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2019.108321; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85067650879&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31229585; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0165027019301797; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2019.108321
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know