Reactions to organ donation appeals in public service announcements aimed at African Americans
Journal of the National Medical Association, ISSN: 0027-9684, Vol: 113, Issue: 6, Page: 645-653
2022
- 2Citations
- 3Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This study examines different types of organ donation public service announcement appeal messages (narrative, counter argument, and statistical) in relation to their effectiveness on the African American community. Previous studies on public service announcements aimed at African Americans and how effective the different message appeals are examined along with issues effecting the likelihood of African Americans consenting to be organ donors. African American participants were recruited using the Qualtrics survey company. Analysis of survey data suggest that narrative appeals are more effective than statistical and counter argument appeals but statistical and counter argument did not differ from each other. Implications of this finding along with directions for future research is included.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0027968421001073; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnma.2021.06.002; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85110520239&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34274146; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0027968421001073; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnma.2021.06.002
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know