Use of standardised feeding protocols in neonatal units - A national survey of Australian neonatal nurses and dietitians
Journal of Neonatal Nursing, ISSN: 1355-1841, Vol: 29, Issue: 2, Page: 313-319
2023
- 16Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures16
- Readers16
- 16
Article Description
/Aim: Given the limited literature, this study aimed to describe current feeding practices as reported by neonatal staff, including use of Standardised Feeding Protocols (SFPs) and pasteurised donor human milk (PDHM). An electronic survey was emailed to neonatal nurses and dietitians through professional organisations and networks. Descriptive and chi-square tests were conducted. Comments were summarised into themes. Eligible respondents (n = 229) were female (98%), neonatal nurses (95%) with 17 (0.3–43) years of experience. Most (82%) observed SFPs in neonatal settings. Over 75% reported breast milk, term formula or low birth weight formula inclusion in SFPs. PDHM was included less often in SFPs (52%), particularly in regional/rural (10%) than capital areas (71%, p < 0.001). Patient weight and growth were common criteria used for commencing or ceasing fortification. Themes emerged supporting PDHM availability, and consistent SFPs across Australia. An opportunity to standardise evidence-based SFPs across neonatal settings exists.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1355184122001314; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnn.2022.07.008; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85135507319&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1355184122001314; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnn.2022.07.008
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know