Embodied energy and CO 2 emissions of life cycle assessment (LCA) in the traditional and contemporary Iranian construction systems
Journal of Building Engineering, ISSN: 2352-7102, Vol: 39, Page: 102310
2021
- 54Citations
- 186Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The Iranian building sector is the second contributor in energy consumption and carbon emissions. While the conventional construction systems and industrial building material in this industry are exacerbating the situation, the use of traditional techniques and earthen sustainable materials are left out. This paper seeks to unravel the environmental benefits of using traditional techniques, and earthen materials in the context of Yazd city. To do this, embodied and the operational energy and carbon emissions are selected to be investigated. Using LCA methodology, embodied and operational energy and carbon emissions of a pilot passive building which is built by Traditional Techniques and Materials (TTM) is compared with a building constructed by conventional systems and materials (CSM). Based on the results, the embodied energy and carbon emissions of TTM is 2.86 GJ/m 2 and 220 kg CO 2 eq/m 2 which shows 43% and 48% decrease compared to CSM, respectively. Also the operational energy and carbon emissions are 0.35 GJ/m 2 and 68.25 kg CO 2 eq/m 2 which are 88% and 81% lower than those of CSM, respectively. The main conclusion of this study is that due to the short life span of buildings in Iran, the impact of embodied energy on the life cycle of both TTM and CSM is significant, Moreover, the embodied energy constitute a larger share in TTM overall life cycle energy (89.1%). By comparing TTM and CSM, it is also concluded that the traditional techniques and earthen materials could have a profound impact on the overall life cycle energy and carbon emissions.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352710221001662; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102310; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85101698736&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2352710221001662; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102310
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know