Behaviour of glulam timber frames with different beam-column connections and braces under reversed cyclic loads
Journal of Building Engineering, ISSN: 2352-7102, Vol: 49, Page: 104031
2022
- 10Citations
- 23Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This paper discusses the behaviour of glulam timber frames under reversed cyclic loading conditions. Four single-storey timber frames with different beam-column connections and braces were tested in the experimental programme. The load resistance, stiffness, ductility, energy dissipation and equivalent damping ratio of frames were obtained through experimental tests. Besides, moment resistances of beam-column connections were also calculated by using the measured strains of glulam timber. Comparisons were made among timber frames with different types of connections and braces to highlight the influence of beam-column connections on frame behaviour under reversed cyclic loading and the differences in load resistance, deformation capacity, stiffness degradation, energy dissipation and equivalent damping ratio were discussed. Besides, bending moments at the column base were also calculated by using the measured strains of columns and the associated moment-rotation relationship was obtained. Test results showed that the seismic behaviour of timber frames was significantly enhanced by using top-and-seat-steel-angle connections and diagonal braces.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352710222000444; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104031; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85122998291&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2352710222000444; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104031
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know