Assessment of groundwater arsenic contamination level in Jharkhand, India using machine learning
Journal of Computational Science, ISSN: 1877-7503, Vol: 63, Page: 101779
2022
- 15Citations
- 26Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This paper presents a machine learning approach for assessing groundwater arsenic contamination levels in Jharkhand, India. The water is essential for sustaining life, and the presence of heavy metals like arsenic poses a carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risk. In this study, various machine learning models viz Decision tree, Random Forest, Multilayer Perceptron, and Naive Bayes algorithms were applied to classify the samples as safe or unsafe, considering a provisional guide value of 0.01 mg/l as the benchmark. For classification, different parameters viz DEM, subsoil clay content, subsoil silt content, subsoil sand content, subsoil organic content, type of soil, and LULC were considered. Pearson correlation exhibited a positive and a negative relation between considered parameters and arsenic occurrence. Parameters obtained were considered for the classification of arsenic, and various evaluation criteria, such as accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, were used to analyze models’ performance. Among the models, the Random Forest classifier outperforms other classifier models in terms of performance. Thus, the Random Forest model can be used to approximation people prone to arsenic contamination.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877750322001570; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2022.101779; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85134804377&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1877750322001570; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2022.101779
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know