Improving the coking resistance of Ni/Al 2 O 3 modified by promoter (Ce, Zr, or Mg) under ethanol steam reforming: Perspective from growth sites of coking
Journal of the Energy Institute, ISSN: 1743-9671, Vol: 104, Page: 35-45
2022
- 14Citations
- 15Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
A series of nickel catalysts supported on Al 2 O 3 that modified with Ce-, Zr-, and Mg-promoter were prepared via a sol-gel method and a subsequent impregnation method for the ethanol steam reforming reaction (ESR). The effect of promoters on the carbon deposition was focused. Compared with Ni/Al 2 O 3 catalyst, the introduction of different promoters decreased the selectivity for CH 2 CH 2 to different extent, especially, Ce-, Mg- containing catalysts completely suppressed the production of CH 2 CH 2 for 30 h tested at 500 °C. And the medium and strong acid sites were confirmed as the major sites for CH 2 CH 2 production. Encapsulation carbon derived from ethylene takes the primary responsibility for carbon deposition, and the formation of metal carbide is the other reason for causing carbon deposition. Among the tested catalysts, Ni/Mg–Al 2 O 3 exhibited a better performance for anti-carbon, which was attributed to the blockage of medium and strong acid sites as well as the high Ni crystallinity.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1743967122001192; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2022.07.003; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85134753383&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1743967122001192; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2022.07.003
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know