Self-Traction During Mechanical Cervical Dilatation, Acceptability, Feasibility and Satisfaction of its Application: A Pilot Study
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, ISSN: 1701-2163, Vol: 46, Issue: 5, Page: 102408
2024
- 1Citations
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
Article Description
This study aims to measure acceptability, feasibility, and satisfaction with self-traction during mechanical cervical dilatation to induce labour and to explore its effects on pain and the process of labour and delivery. 60 parturients were randomly assigned to self-traction or regular traction. Participants completed questionnaires about sociodemographic characteristics, acceptability, and satisfaction. Self-traction participants reported significantly higher acceptability ( P = 0.026), and adequacy ( P = 0.018). They also reported satisfaction with the procedure. A group comparison regarding feasibility, pain, and the process of labour and delivery showed no significant difference. Self-traction is an acceptable and feasible intervention for full-term parturients. Cette étude vise à mesurer l’acceptabilité, la faisabilité et la satisfaction de la traction autodirigée pendant la dilatation mécanique du col de l’utérus pour déclencher le travail et à explorer ses effets sur la douleur et le déroulement du travail et de l’accouchement. Au total, 60 parturientes ont été affectées aléatoirement au groupe de traction autodirigée ou au groupe de traction habituelle. Les participantes ont répondu à un questionnaire sur leurs caractéristiques sociodémographiques, l’acceptabilité et la satisfaction. D’après les réponses au questionnaire, l’acceptabilité ( P = 0,026) et la convenance ( P = 0,018) étaient significativement plus élevées dans le groupe traction autodirigée. Les patientes de ce groupe se sont aussi dites satisfaites de l’intervention. Une comparaison des groupes concernant la faisabilité, la douleur et le déroulement du travail et de l’accouchement n’a révélé aucune différence significative. La traction autodirigée est une intervention acceptable et réalisable pour les parturientes à terme.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1701216324001841; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2024.102408; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85189024489&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38340985; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1701216324001841; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2024.102408
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know