Circulating levels of Elabela in pregnant women complicated with intrauterine growth restriction
Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction, ISSN: 2468-7847, Vol: 50, Issue: 8, Page: 102127
2021
- 17Citations
- 29Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations17
- Citation Indexes17
- 17
- CrossRef15
- Captures29
- Readers29
- 29
Article Description
This study aimed to detect Elabela concentrations in the serum of normotensive pregnant women complicated with intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and compare them with the uncomplicated healthy pregnancies. This prospective case-control study was performed from May 1, 2020 to September 30, 2020. Of the 92 pregnant patients included in the study, we enrolled 49 normotensive patients complicated with IUGR as the study group, and 43 normotensive healthy gestational age-matched and body mass index (BMI)-matched patients without IUGR or additional pregnancy complication as the control group. Demographic and clinical characteristics, and maternal serum Elabela concentrations were recorded. Maternal serum Elabela levels were significantly lower in IUGR pregnancies (4.02±3.42 ng/mL) compared to healthy pregnant women (14.01±18.38 ng/mL, p <0.001). There was a positive intermediate correlation between maternal serum Elabela levels and the birth weight ( r = 0.308, p = 0.004). Maternal circulating levels of Elabela were significantly lower in IUGR pregnancies than in healthy pregnant women. Also, birth weight was positively correlated with maternal serum Elabela levels. We consider that Elabela might be a crucial biomarker of the pathophysiologic process in pregnancies complicated by IUGR.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468784721000696; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2021.102127; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85103707615&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33781971; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2468784721000696; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2021.102127
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know