3D Bioprinting:principles, fantasies and prospects
Journal of Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, ISSN: 2468-7855, Vol: 120, Issue: 2, Page: 128-132
2019
- 36Citations
- 173Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations36
- Citation Indexes36
- 36
- CrossRef24
- Captures173
- Readers173
- 173
Article Description
Conventional three-dimensional (3D) printing techniques have been growing in importance in the field of reconstructive surgery. Three-dimensional bioprinting is the adaptation of 3D printing techniques to tissue engineering, through the use of a bio-ink containing living cells and biomaterials. We hereby describe the principles of bioprinting, its main current limitations, and the prospects of this technique. A PubMed/MEDLINE search was performed. A total of 40 publications were included. To date, most of the tissues have been printed with promising results in vitro (e.g., skin, cartilage, and muscle). The first animal studies are promising for small-scale defects. Vascularization issues are the main limitation to printing large constructs. Once the barrier of vascularization is overcome, printing organs and composite tissues of any size could be possible, opening the doors for personalized medicine based on medical imaging. Printing custom-made autologous grafts or flaps could minimize donor site morbidity and maximize the morphological results. Considering the potential future applications of bioprinting in the field of reconstructive surgery, one has to be aware of this tool, which could drastically change our practice.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468785518302854; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2018.12.014; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85059678277&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30609384; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2468785518302854; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2018.12.014
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know