A Review of Potential National Chronic Pain Surveillance Systems in the United States
The Journal of Pain, ISSN: 1526-5900, Vol: 23, Issue: 9, Page: 1492-1509
2022
- 24Citations
- 58Captures
- 2Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations24
- Citation Indexes22
- 22
- CrossRef8
- Policy Citations2
- 2
- Captures58
- Readers58
- 58
- Mentions2
- News Mentions2
- 2
Most Recent News
Chronic Pain Among Adults — United States, 2019–2021
Summary What is already known about this topic? An estimated 50 million adults in the United States experienced chronic pain (i.e., pain lasting ≥3 months)
Review Description
Pain has been established as a major public health problem in the United States (U.S.) with 50 million adults experiencing chronic pain and 20 million afflicted with high-impact chronic pain (ie, chronic pain that interferes with life or work activities). High financial and social costs are associated with chronic pain. Over the past 2 decades, pain management has been complicated by the marked increase in opioids prescribed to treat chronic noncancer pain and by the concurrent opioid crisis. Monitoring the prevalence of chronic pain and pain management is especially important because pain management is changing in uncertain ways. We review potential U.S. chronic pain surveillance systems, present potential difficulties of chronic pain surveillance, and explore how to address chronic pain surveillance in the current opioid era. We consider case definitions, severity, anatomic site, and varieties of chronic pain management strategies in reviewing and evaluating national surveys for chronic pain surveillance. Based on the criteria evaluated, the National Health Interview Survey offers the best single source for pain surveillance as the pain-related questions administered are brief, valid, and cover a broad scope of pain-related phenomena. This review article describes data sources that can be leveraged to conduct national chronic pain surveillance in the United States, explores case defining or pain-related questions administered, and evaluates them against 8 surveillance attributes.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1526590022002851; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2022.02.013; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85130321581&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35421595; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1526590022002851; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2022.02.013
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know