Laparoscopic versus ultrasound-guided visualization of transversus abdominis plane blocks
Journal of Pediatric Surgery, ISSN: 0022-3468, Vol: 56, Issue: 6, Page: 1190-1195
2021
- 6Citations
- 40Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Ultrasound-guided (US) transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is commonly utilized as part of a multi-modal approach for postoperative pain management. This study seeks to determine whether laparoscopic-guided TAP blocks are as effective as US-guided TAP blocks among pediatric patients. In this prospective, randomized controlled trial, pediatric patients undergoing laparoscopic procedures were randomly assigned to one of two treatment arms: US-guided TAP block (US-arm) or laparoscopic-guided TAP block (LAP-arm). Primary outcome was PACU pain scores. Secondary outcomes included PACU opioid consumption, block completion time and block accuracy. Twenty-five patients were enrolled in each arm. In the LAP-arm, 59% of blocks were in the transversus abdominis plane compared to 74% of TAP blocks in the US-arm ( p = 0.18). Blocks were completed faster in the LAP-arm (2.1 ± 1.9 vs. 7.9 ± 3.4 min, p <0.001). The average highest PACU pain score was 3.4 ± 3.1 for the LAP-arm and 4.3 ± 3.8 for the US-arm ( p = 0.37). Overall PACU pain scores and opioid consumption were similar between the groups (1.2 ± 1.3 vs. 1.6 ± 1.6, p = 0.24; 2.2 ± 5.8 vs. 0.9 ± 1.4MME, p = 0.26). Laparoscopic TAP blocks have equivalent efficacy in post-operative pain scores, narcotic use, and tissue plane accuracy as compared to US-guided TAP blocks. They are also completed faster and may result in less operating room and general anesthetic time for the pediatric patient.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022346821001597; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2021.02.025; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85103109346&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33771368; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022346821001597; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2021.02.025
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know